Physician Contract Red Flags | MedXL
An employment contract is the single document most likely to shape your income, schedule, and career mobility for years, yet many physicians sign after a quick skim. The good news is that problem contracts tend to fail in predictable places. This guide walks through the clauses that deserve the closest reading, whether you are joining a hospital system in the United States or a group practice in Canada, and explains when a vague sentence is a genuine red flag rather than boilerplate.
One caveat before we begin: contract law, non-compete enforceability, and physician employment norms vary by state and province, and they change. Treat everything here as a checklist of questions to raise, not legal advice. Before signing, have the agreement reviewed by a lawyer who regularly handles physician contracts in your jurisdiction.
Compensation that cannot be calculated from the document
The clearest red flag in any contract is a compensation formula you cannot independently verify. If your pay depends on productivity, collections, or a bonus pool, the contract should define every input.
Watch for:
- Undefined productivity metrics. If the agreement pays on wRVUs, collections, or "net revenue," it should state exactly how those are counted, which conversion factor applies, and how disputes are resolved. "As determined by the employer" is not a formula.
- Bonus criteria left to discretion. A "discretionary bonus" is, by definition, optional. If a recruiter quoted you a bonus verbally, it belongs in writing.
- Reconciliation and clawback terms. Draw-against-production models can leave you owing money back. Understand when and how any deficit is recovered, and what happens to it if you leave mid-year.
- Silent escalation. If the offer letter promised a raise after year one, confirm the contract says so. Offer letters are usually superseded by the signed agreement.
Ask for a worked example: "Show me the math for a physician who produced X last year." A reputable employer can produce one quickly.
Vague or one-sided termination provisions
Termination language decides how much notice you get, how much you must give, and what you walk away with.
- Without-cause termination with a short notice period. Most contracts allow either party to end the relationship without cause. If the employer can terminate on 30 days' notice while you owe 180, that asymmetry matters, especially if your signing bonus or relocation repayment obligations survive.
- Broad "for cause" definitions. For-cause termination should be limited to serious, defined events such as licence loss or exclusion from payer programs. Language like "failure to meet expectations" or "conduct detrimental to the employer" gives the other side wide discretion and can strip you of notice pay.
- Repayment triggers. Signing bonuses, student-loan support, and relocation funds often must be repaid if you leave early. Check whether repayment is prorated, and whether it is triggered even when the employer terminates you without cause. That last scenario is a genuine red flag.
Restrictive covenants that outlast the job
Non-competes, non-solicits, and confidentiality clauses are common, but their reasonableness varies enormously.
- Geographic scope. A radius measured from every facility the employer operates, rather than your primary practice site, can quietly cover an entire metropolitan area.
- Duration and activity scope. A restriction covering all clinical practice, rather than your specialty, is broader than most employers need.
- Enforceability is jurisdiction-specific. Some US states restrict or ban physician non-competes; others enforce them readily. Canadian courts apply their own reasonableness tests, and provincial norms differ. Never assume a clause is unenforceable, and never rely on internet summaries; ask a local lawyer how courts in that state or province actually treat these clauses.
- Non-solicitation of patients and staff. These can be more consequential than the non-compete itself if you plan to open a practice nearby.
If you are told "we never enforce that," ask for the clause to be narrowed or removed. Verbal assurances do not survive a change in leadership.
Malpractice coverage gaps, especially tail
Insurance language is dense, and the most expensive omission is usually the tail.
- Confirm whether the policy is occurrence-based or claims-made. Claims-made policies typically need tail coverage after you leave.
- The contract should state who pays for tail coverage and under which termination scenarios. Silence usually means you pay, and tail premiums can be substantial.
- In Canada, many physicians obtain protection through the Canadian Medical Protective Association rather than commercial insurance, and hospital or provincial arrangements vary. Confirm what applies to your role and who bears the cost.
- Check coverage limits, whether moonlighting or outside work is covered, and whether the employer can change carriers or limits unilaterally.
Schedule, call, and duties left undefined
A contract that is precise about your obligations but vague about the employer's is unbalanced by design.
- Call frequency. "Call as assigned" or "call shared equitably" gives you no ceiling. Push for a stated maximum or a defined rotation.
- Location and reassignment. Language allowing the employer to assign you to "any facility" can mean a long commute after a merger.
- Duties creep. Administrative work, supervision of advanced practice providers, and outreach clinics should be named and, where relevant, compensated.
- Amendment clauses. A provision letting the employer amend policies "from time to time," where those policies are incorporated into the contract, can change your working conditions without your signature.
Process red flags around the negotiation itself
Sometimes the warning sign is not a clause but how the employer behaves.
- Pressure to sign quickly. A legitimate offer survives two weeks of legal review.
- Refusal to put verbal promises in writing. If it mattered enough to say, it matters enough to write.
- "Standard contract, we never change it." Even large systems routinely accept modest edits, and an absolute refusal to discuss terms tells you how future disputes will go.
- No exhibit for compensation or call schedules. Key numbers hidden in referenced-but-unattached exhibits should be attached before you sign.
- Mismatch with the job posting. Compare the contract against the posting and your offer letter line by line. If you are still comparing opportunities, a structured search helps; MedXL's job search lets you filter physician roles by specialty, region, and practice setting so you can benchmark an offer against the wider market.
Getting the review done properly
A physician-contract lawyer in your state or province is the right reviewer, ideally one who sees dozens of these agreements a year. Give them your priorities in advance: income certainty, geographic flexibility, exit terms, or schedule protection. Ask for a written summary of the top risks and proposed redlines, then decide which points are worth negotiating. Most employers expect two or three rounds of edits, and negotiating professionally almost never costs you the offer.
Key takeaways
- If you cannot compute your own pay from the contract's text, the formula is not finished.
- Termination clauses deserve as much attention as compensation, including notice symmetry and repayment triggers.
- Non-compete enforceability varies by state and province; get local legal advice rather than relying on general rules.
- Confirm in writing who pays for malpractice tail coverage in every exit scenario.
- Undefined call, location, and duty language shifts all future flexibility to the employer.
- Pressure to sign fast, or refusal to write down verbal promises, is itself a red flag.